What is the motivation behind a cyberattack?

Table of Contents

Malicious attacks on computer systems and networks to destroy data or disrupt operations are known as cyber-attacks. It is critical to understand the goals and motivations behind any cyberattacks to defend against them successfully. Even though cyberattacks are carried out in a variety of ways, and for a variety of reasons, the primary motivations can be divided into six categories, as shown below:

To Make A Political Or Social Point: Hackers can criticize everything from governments, politicians, society, significant corporations, and current events. When they disagree with their targets, they attack them, such as by disrupting their website. They are less technical than other attackers and prefer to use pre-made tools to assault their targets.

Radical Hackerism: This group is mainly made up of bored teenagers looking for a rush of adrenaline or trying to vent their frustrations or fury against institutions (such as schools) or persons they believe are wrong. Furthermore, some people are simply looking for attention and admiration from their peers. Companies typically disregard radical hacktivism since its objective is unrelated to financial matters.

For a highbrow challenge: This institution of humans, much like excessive hackers, engages in cyberattacks for you to get interest and respect from friends with the aid of attacking network security. This kind of hacker performs at the concept of the socially awkward loner who lives in a digital global and hacks for the highbrow venture and adrenaline rush of breaking into a network.

Money: Many sorts of attacks, including ransomware, phishing, and data theft, can be motivated by this (for sale or ransom of records). If the transaction is small, a cryptocurrency will be used, and wire transfers will be used for more significant sums. The cybercriminal will gain money by either personally extorting money from the victim or profiting from selling the victim’s data on underground markets.

Commercial Competition: DDoS attacks are becoming more popular as a business strategy. Some of these attacks aim to prevent competitors from competing in important events, while others strive to shut down internet enterprises for months at a time. In either case, the goal is to wreak havoc and attract competitors’ customers to your side while causing financial and reputational harm.

Cyberwarfare is a battle fought over the net and the flow of records. Cyberattacks subsidized through the government are being used to silence government warring parties and inner dissent and undermine essential economic, fitness, and infrastructure services in adversary international locations. These attacks are backed by nation-states, implying that they are well-funded and well-planned operations carried out by tech-savvy individuals.

DataSpace Security’s Cyber Security service proactively investigates suspected compromises, detects advanced threats, and improves cyber defenses to help your organization protect against all sorts of assaults. Our professionals use purpose-built technologies to orchestrate a thorough and iterative process of human and semi-automated searches for Indicators of Compromise (IOC) and Initial Vectors of Compromise (IVOC).

FIGs: Some thieves like the opportunity to exploit flaws. Others do it for ideological motives or to strain the discharge of information they believe is within the public hobby. Others can also never forgive, whether or not it is for the lousy carrier, a defective product, or to settle a score. They could employ any of the strategies listed above or launch DDoS attacks based on their motivations; however, this approach might also be used for political or competitive reasons.

At the same time, as there isn’t always plenty of information available on attacks and their motivations, we did stumble upon an exciting Raconteur infographic. It raises a few essential points to think about.

1. The most common target of attacks is a financial crime (41 percent ). This isn’t always sudden, but what is surprising is that insider threats (27%) and aggressive (26%) targets are ranked 2d and third, respectively.
2. The manufacturing business appears to be significantly more vulnerable to espionage than the finance sector.
3. While financial motives are prevalent in the healthcare profession, FIG motivations are also principal.
4. Public administration is subjected to fewer espionage attacks than the manufacturing industry (both in terms of the overall number of attacks and absolute numbers). This may seem odd at first, but it could be because there are fewer public administration targets in manufacturing. It could be because public administration is better prepared and aware of the worth of their data to attackers.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn