Impact of Human Behaviour on Security
Table of Contents
It's our nature to be efficient – finding the simplest and quickest way to complete a task – but this often goes against what's required to secure data and files. Hundreds of productiveness tip articles advocate performance as we all try and multitask ourselves to death. On the other hand, shortcuts are too dangerous for data security. And in today's cyber-insecure environment, that risk isn't worth taking; there's simply too much at stake for both businesses and consumers.
The only efficient approach to genuinely protect and prevent data leaks while ensuring compliance is to entirely remove people from the equation and replace them with transparency and automation. There isn't any other option. But how can that be accomplished? The majority of data security solutions on the market allow users to choose which files to secure and encrypt and those to leave alone. My advice is to do the polar opposite and protect everyone. It protects companies from internal and external threats and enables only administrators and privileged users to opt-out of specific files selectively. This is done without affecting how users collaborate, share, and use data. It's a fresh perspective in an ever-changing world.
The following are four reasons why no one should control Security for human-based behavior
- The world is simply too unsafe to live in
Unfortunately, we live in a world of Zero Trust, and we have no idea when or where the subsequent breach will occur. It's hard to predict what data will be helpful in the future, and relying on consumers to guess is too hazardous. You can't rely on user participation to keep the system running in this setting. You must also consider how data is really used and shared between devices, both within and outside the business.
Transparent solutions are the most successful when it comes to adequate data security. They operate in the background, providing asset protection that is automatic and non-disruptive.
- Manual approaches cannot keep up with the pace of change
It would never work to decide what needs to be classified or protected using manual approaches — it simply couldn't scale. Because there may be a lot of facts being created, even supposing a large percentage of it is manually safeguarded, there'll nonetheless be a massive amount of information this is unprotected, setting your employer at hazard for data safety and compliance.
Furthermore, everything must be logged to maintain security. A technological solution would automatically record all data for reporting and auditing purposes, and security orchestration tools would take prompt action depending on any threats discovered in the logs.
For instance, suppose an unknown process attempts to open Microsoft Word files quickly, say 10 per minute. This is most likely a virus. An orchestration tool can use automation to conduct an antivirus scan on the device right away.
- It's difficult to keep track of too much sharing
When and where content is created, security must begin. With today's proliferation of devices and the amount of content generated in the cloud, there are far too many workflows and different ways for content to be shared, altered, and saved. Secure data can easily be passed on inadvertently. An employee might copy financial data from a particular document in a report or details on a potential acquisition to add to a PowerPoint presentation to management. This information is no longer protected once it leaves the security of a secured file and enters another document. Protective spinoff works anyplace they come to be is an enormous task that demands a centralized, automated device.
- Some data breaches are done on purpose
According to Intel research, 43 percent of data breaches are triggered by employees, either mistakenly or deliberately. Disgruntled personnel can wreak havoc on a company's security, that's unsettling to recall.
People are crucial to data security and act as critical administrators, but they cannot be the end-all solution. Human behavior has shown that humans prefer to take the easy way out, cut corners, and make errors.
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin